In a recent video I alluded to the role of the Anglobitch (AB) hypothesis in explaining the behavior of modern women, particularly those of the Western variety. Obviously the West-based designation is fraught with limitations, yet I would assume most readers have a rough idea of who it collectively refers to. They may not however be familiar with where the AB concept originates, or what specifics prop up its claims about the world.
My own exposure to the idea is actually quite fresh, with fault going to a random comment-giver on some non-YouTube site. Their casual dropping of the AB term led me to a blog bearing the same title, with digital roots stretching back to the days long before Andrew Tate and FitFresh prematurely climaxed on the internet.
Put shortly, the AB thesis holds that trouble surrounding women in the West (especially but not exclusively Caucasian females), stems from a host of historical factors going back to the New World’s foundation. Crucially in the case of Burgerland, there is the influence of Puritanical politics on the romantic realm. Puritans, true to their collective description, tended to uplift the sanctity (purity) of women throughout society, resulting in some measure of deification for the gentle sex, and condemnation of philanderers. Crimes surrounding illegitimacy were also roundly punished, shoring up the centrality of marriage in the social sphere, and creating a tradition which would live on well into the 1800s. This meant that women were awarded the ability to select mates in a discerning manner whilst remaining generally cold and entitled by virtue of their public status.
Scarcity merely added to the cursed foundational structure. As settlers moved to conquer the American West, women were often left behind in safer realms, and would make the traverse in smaller numbers even once ranches and towns had been established. Thus the few females lucky enough to attain secure passage had an outsized degree of importance in male-dominated regions. Men could of course try for a squaw or the occasional Latina who drifted far enough north to service the gringo, but racial preferences would at times be an obstacle. Note that a similar problem originated in Latin America among the early Spanish colonists, who demanded wives of their own stock rather than compromising with the abundant Indio population.
The influence of this “frontier privilege” has prevailed throughout history to modern America. Males are trained from an early age to orient their entire lives around behavior and lifestyles which will tickle the fancy of women, who comparatively must bring little to the table. Songs feature attractive men worshiping mediocre women for simply existing, politics revolves around the Second Sex in one form or the other, and consumerism is almost entirely driven by the feminine imperative.
These elements result in a scenario wherein any man of integrity cannot trust what another fellow says because the latter is almost certainly acting with an ear to the ground regarding judgment from a potential future “life partner”. Spectators doubting the aforementioned behavior should examine internet comment sections; even if no women necessarily follow the content at stake, gallant simps will do battle with “misogyny” proudly, because society has trained them for no higher purpose.
Perhaps the answer lies in being a “Pa$$port Bro”, or learning about transactional interactions from legends like Darth Hideous. Such answers may work for souls with a raw, Blackpilled mentality about the world, but in the case of others they remain inadequate. Chaps concerned about their lineage and the prospects of offspring with a 5 ft. Filipino woman may need to face the music. Either retake control of the nation, or try the age-old mating dance with a frigid Anglo creature.
You must be logged in to post a comment.